Agentic Security Audits | Miguel Automate

INJECTION
VAULT

Independent AI red teaming for MCP and multi-agent systems. I run black-box, safety-first prompt-injection audits that map logic drift and trust boundaries without touching your code.

Agentic Red Teaming Services

Specialized audits that treat agentic logic as the primary attack surface, with evidence-first reporting designed for engineers who need reproducible proof, not marketing scores.

Adversarial Logic Methodology

Proprietary context-injection methodology for MCP-enabled agents to map logic drift, confused-deputy paths, and trust-boundary failures without exposing the process.

Soft vs Deep Testing

Phase 1 is read-only probing of context-window boundaries. Phase 2 is deeper testing in a staging environment to simulate tool-use escalation and agent-to-agent misuse.

Vulnerability Manifest

Evidence-first deliverables: PoC logs, logic-breach mapping, and trust-boundary analysis showing how indirect injections traverse data sources and agent handshakes.

Black-Box Assurance

External attacker posture with no code access or prompt sharing. Your team receives only the successful PoC inputs after testing so you can reproduce and patch fast.

Independent Audit Policy

Strict separation of duties: I identify weaknesses and provide evidence only. Fixes, updates, and integrations are handled under a separate contract.

Zero-Integration Risk

No agents to install. No API keys to share. Testing runs from the outside-in, mirroring real-world adversaries while keeping production safe.

Technical Focus

Agentic Logic & MCP Trust

Specialized testing for agent-to-agent handoffs, tool authorization, and context ingestion pathways that standard scanners overlook.

Dynamic Adversarial Testing

Human-style adversarial probing that adapts to your product logic rather than relying on static signatures or generic checklists.

Evidence-First Artifacts

Deliverables focus on reproducible prompts, traceable logic breaches, and clear vulnerability narratives for engineering teams.

Context Window Boundary Mapping

Targeted testing of indirect injection paths to see how untrusted context reshapes agent intent across long and multi-source inputs.

Trust & Governance

Rules of Engagement

Formal scope definitions, consent tracking, and explicit boundaries that keep testing safe and legally clean.

Engagement Protocol (RoE)

Mandatory Rules of Engagement define in-scope MCP servers, agent workflows, and safety constraints between read-only and staging phases to prevent downtime.

Black-Box Integrity

Testing mirrors external threats with no privileged access to prompts or code. This preserves realism and audit credibility.

Separation of Duties

Audit-only stance avoids conflicts of interest. Fixes and updates are handled independently by your team or a separate engagement.

Adversarial Intelligence

Injection Vault stays current with active weaponization trends, so audits reflect today’s agentic threat landscape instead of last year’s prompt hacks.

Zero-Click Agentic Attacks

Stress-testing autonomous agents and browser workflows against silent hijacks and unsafe execution paths that require no user confirmation.

MCP & Protocol Exploitation

Hardening agent communication channels against session abuse, resource drain, and privilege escalation across tool boundaries.

Indirect Context Poisoning

Mapping how agents ingest poisoned markdown, files, or third-party data and convert it into executable intent or policy drift.

Vulnerability Manifest

Executive-ready artifacts that translate adversarial findings into reproducible evidence for engineers.

THE TRACE

How a specific input entered through a data source or agent handoff.

THE BREACH

Where the agent misinterpreted context and crossed a trust boundary.

THE IMPACT

What unauthorized action, leakage, or policy deviation occurred.

THE PROOF

Raw PoC logs and prompts to reproduce the failure internally.

The Mission

Injection Vault is a specialized adversarial framework for professional AI red teaming. It focuses on prompt injection, logic drift, and agent trust boundary failures in MCP and multi-agent architectures. The goal is a safe, external audit that delivers reproducible evidence without modifying your systems.

DEVELOPER
Miguel Ocampo
LANGUAGE
Julia
PURPOSE
Legal Red Teaming
AVAILABILITY
Private Service

Audit Standards FAQ

Clear answers to the questions founders and security leads ask first.

How does Injection Vault work without seeing our prompts or code?

The audit is intentionally black-box. I test your system exactly as an external adversary would, without privileged access. This preserves realism and ensures the findings reflect true exposure. After testing, you receive the successful PoC prompts and logs so your team can reproduce and fix.

How do your findings align with global security standards?

Every audit is mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and the ML Security Top 10. Findings are categorized under high-impact risks such as LLM01 (Prompt Injection), LLM02 (Insecure Output Handling), and LLM08 (Excessive Agency). This makes the Vulnerability Manifest enterprise-ready for security reviews, compliance conversations, and investor diligence.

How current is the Injection Vault methodology?

The threat landscape moves weekly. Injection Vault updates continuously based on active research into zero-click agent hijacks, MCP protocol weaknesses, and indirect context poisoning. The goal is to test your system against what is emerging now, not just what was known last quarter.